âBâIvrit: A Hebrew Language Media Roundupâ is a monthly look at the news through the eyes of Israeli media consumers.
1. Drinking Lâchaim in the TV studio
It was an odd, yet very telling, moment on Israeli TV.
Channel 12âs top political commentator Amit Segal, hosting Meet the Press, one of Israelâs most-watched news shows, took out a bottle of arakâ a Middle Eastern alcoholic beverage in the anise familyâand a few paper cups and offered the distinguished panelists in his studio a shot. The reason for this unusual gesture on prime-time TV was to celebrate the successful Israeli assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah. Before raising his glass, Segal quoted Judges 5:31: âSo let all thine enemies perish, O Lord.âÂ
Some around the table seemed a bit uncomfortable, but all raised their cups and drank. Segalâs co-host Ben Caspit, perhaps feeling the inappropriateness of Segal’s celebration, added that he is drinking for the release of the hostages. Another panelist suggested it may be too early to celebrate.Â
The next day, Segal responded to critics who felt uneasy with his lâchaim by posting historic photos on X of Americans and Europeans celebrating the news of Hitlerâs death.
Raising a glass of arak in the TV studio may sound extreme, but it is fully in line with the response of all Israeli news outlets following Fridayâs military operation against the Hezbollah bunker in Beirut, which killed Nasrallah and at least 20 other top Hezbollah commanders.
A year into the war, it is safe to say that the Israeli press has given up on the idea of reporting from the sidelines. Instead, the media is now first to lead the cheers when news of battleground victories arrives, and it is also there to set the tone when tragedy hits. Thereâs nothing wrong or surprising about it. Journalists in Israel, just like any other Israelis these days, hope for their countryâs success and grieve with its loss. This lack of boundaries can lead to a table full of respected journalists and analysts drinking shots of arak in the studio to celebrate the death of their enemy.
2. How the story played out
âHis Day Has Come,â announced the headline of Yediot Ahronot, Israelâs largest centrist newspaper, over a full-page photo of the late Nasrallah. âA New Middle East,â exclaimed Israel Hayom, the nationâs popular right-wing daily. An image of smoke rising from the bombed Hezbollah compound and another of Nasrallah in crosshairs served as a backdrop for this headline. Editors at Maariv, a center-right daily, chose the exact same wording for their headline âA New Middle East,â perhaps hoping too, that the death of Nasrallah somehow assures a bright future for the region. The front-page article detailed the military operation in which the Israeli air force dropped 83 one-ton bombs on Nasrallah and his colleagues and the decision-making process in Israel that preceded the attack.
The celebratory mood swept almost all Israeli media outlets. Coverage included astonishment at the unparalleled intelligence that enabled pinpointing Nasrallah and endless praise for what was described as an exemplary operation by the pilots who carried out the bombing mission.
Minutes after the news of Israelâs Beirut attack broke, TV news channels shifted into 24-hour breaking news mode, reporting on the operation, pulling out archival material about Nasrallahâs long history of terrorism, and providing hours and hours of studio analysis from military experts trying to guess what happens next.
Almost all chose to ignore questions raised around the world regarding the strategic wisdom in taking out Hezbollahâs leader, or suggestions that Israel should use this military feat to advance the goal of ending the war with an unquestionable victory. The Israeli media was too busy basking in the IDFâs success and framing it as the ultimate assertion of Israelâs invincibility. Watching the news from Israel these past days could lead to one clear conclusion: The shame of October 7 has been erased. Israel is once again the greatest military power in the region.Â
3. The terms we use
Itâs worth taking a moment to look at the terminology used by the Israeli media.
The killing of Nasrallah, and for that matter any terror operator, is described in the Israeli press with the term âchoslu,â or âelimination.â The term has taken over the airwaves: Nasrallah was eliminated; Israel eliminated Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh; Israeli forces eliminated three Hamas terrorists in Rafah, and the list goes on.
The term âeliminationâ to describe the killing of an enemy, whether as a planned assassination or during combat, originated in military jargon and has been fully adopted by Israelâs Hebrew-language press.Â
There is, of course, a good reason for that. Elimination suggests getting rid of a problem, of a danger. It implies that the action taken is positive and will lead to a better future. Other possible terms, such as simply calling the act âkilling,â bear a negative connotation and could raise questions regarding the value, legality or morality of the action.Â
Make no mistake, Hassan Nasrallah, one of the most dangerous terrorists of our times, was indeed a clear and present threat to the lives of every Israeli, as well as many Lebanese, Americans and others who might have crossed his path. The killing of Nasrallah indeed eliminated a threat, and calling it an âeliminationâ makes good sense. Is that the case with all enemy casualties? Probably not.
4. Did Bibi deceive Hezbollahâor the press?
While Israeli pilots were on their way to Beirut to carry out the killing of Nasrallah, Prime Minister Netanyahu was in New York, delivering his speech at the United Nations General Assembly. Minutes after he got off the podium, during a briefing with Israeli reporters, Netanyahuâs military adviser tapped him on his shoulder and whispered something in his ear. Netanyahu left the room abruptly. Moments later, the world learned that Israel had just killed the leader of Hezbollah.
The Israeli press worked hard to provide a play-by-play recreation of the days and hours leading up to Netanyahuâs dramatic decision. Hand fed by Netanyahuâs advisers, reporters shared a photo of Netanyahu giving the final okay, hunched over a secure phone in his New York hotel before leaving for the UN headquarters. The Israeli press also reported how Netanyahuâs entire visit to New York was actually a brilliant ploy to set Hezbollah off track, since theyâd never suspect Israel would carry out such a brazen attack when the prime minister was out of the country.
It was an exciting explanation, and one that fit well with Netanyahuâs PR battle against his critics in Israel who claimed he should not have traveled to the UN General Assembly while his country is at war. Almost all media outlets ran with the storyâattributed only to âsources close to the prime ministerââdescribing Netanyahuâs masterful deception.
It was a great story. But it wasnât true.
With some further reporting, it became clear to reporters that theyâd been fooled. Netanyahu, in fact, did not know before leaving for New York if and when the operation would take place. Netanyahu did not leave for New York in order to deceive Hezbollah. He simply thought it would be a good idea to address the UN in person, even if it meant leaving behind a nation at war for 48 hours.
5. A look from the Haredi side
Media outlets aligned with the ultra-Orthodox groups in Israel also joined the celebration over the killing of Nasrallah, but in their own unique way.
Yated Neeman, one of Israelâs leading Hebrew Haredi publications, led with the story of Nasrallahâs killing, adding in its headline that Israel âcut the head of the snake.â A front-page above-the-fold commentary column, however, explained to the ultra-Orthodox readers, many of whom do not serve in the military, that âone should not be mistaken to think that the military might and power are our protectors. Our only protector and defender is our holy Torah.â
Hamevaser, another Haredi publication, combined in its headline the two narratives: âWith Godâs grace: Arch-terrorist Hassan Nasrallah has been eliminated.â
One thought on “B’Ivrit | The Elimination of Hassan Nasrallah”
This excellent report is consistent with the quality that I have come to expect from Moment.